Coachentric drafts your client's next phase from their logged sessions, then argues with its own draft before you send it. Built by a coach, in daily use with real clients.
Most coaching software is built to deliver programmes. Very little of it helps you write them.
So the part that actually takes your evenings — reading back through what happened last block, deciding what changes and why, typing it all out again for the fourth client this week — is still entirely yours. That's the part Coachentric does with you.
Every set your client logged is what the next phase gets built from — the loads that moved, the ones that stalled three weeks running, the sessions that quietly didn't happen.
Nothing goes to a client on the strength of a model feeling confident. The draft is reviewed against the plan and the logs, and you see the objections — not just the output.
ObjectionIncline Push Up has held 3×12 for three weeks. Adding a fourth set repeats a stimulus that has already stopped working — change the angle instead.
ObjectionPallof Press was performed twice in twelve sessions. Progressing its load assumes work that isn't in the log.
A beginner with a full gym membership gets a beginner's programme with barbells in it — not a novice bodyweight circuit, and not a snatch. Most tools collapse those two questions into one and get both wrong.
I'm Du, and I coach full time. I built Coachentric because my Sunday evenings were disappearing into rewriting programmes I had already written once.
Everything in it is something I needed first. It has been running my own clients' training for months before I showed it to anybody — which is also why it argues with itself, and why it would rather tell you a draft is wrong than hand you something that looks finished.
If that sounds like your week, I'd like to hear how you're doing it now.
I'm letting a handful in at a time so I can set each one up properly. Tell me roughly how many clients you coach and what you're using now, and I'll be in touch personally.